Skip to main content

Trancender vs. Measureup – Tips for Microsoft Certification Tests

 

  • I've been going certification crazy this year as I've passed 5 certification tests so far. Along the way I've picked up a few tips that might be of interest to someone looking to study for and take a Microsoft Certification exam.
  • Trancender is a win forms app installed locally, so don't need to be connected to internet.
  • Measure up is a web app.
  • Both Measureup and Trancender are seriously out-of-date applications. It is embarrassing that they test your .NET skills and yet the skills of the programmers who wrote these tools is seriously lacking/out-of date.
  • No cut and paste available in Trancender. This makes it hard to try out source code contained in the practice questions and descriptions are more generic than Measureup. For each question Measureup tells you why the right answer is right and the wrong answer is wrong, which helps you understand the way the question asker is thinking and what they are trying to teach or the point they are trying to assess.
  • Both Measureup and Trancender tests are a little harder than the real tests. On a measure up test all the answers usually at least are not nonsensical, they represent valid .NET names, classes etc. On the actual test, you can often eliminate several wrong answers just by being familiar with correct syntax.
  • Measureup allows you to take a short test, and see the answer after each question. This is my favorite way to study for a test: in small chunks. I take a short 10 question test whenever I get a chance to study and dig into any questions I didn't get right. With Trancender you have to take a 30 question test, and can't see the answers until the end.
  • Note that In my experience there are not very many interactive format questions. These are questions that have drag drop functionality. All the questions are multiple choice in which you choose 1 answer. A few questions have two or three right answers.
  • Overall I like Measureup better. It is easier to study on-the-fly, and can be used from any machine without going through an install program most likely written in 1994 using VB6. :)

MCP Testing Tips:

  • I didn't use any practice tests that are actually just copies of the real tests posted on the Internet (brain dumps), that is just plain cheating and Microsoft has clearly stated this. Measureup and Trancender tests however are sanctioned by Microsoft and are linked from their certification website. Measureup and Trancender use similar questions without using the actual questions from the real test. They are good preparation materials because they are a fast way to give you a feel for which concepts will be tested and the types of questions that will be asked. They also get you used to the testing format. I think that in addition to testing your .NET skills, the MCP exams test your pattern recognition and reading compression skills and so practice tests help you sharpen these skills as well. The other thing I like about these practice tests is that there is just a huge amount of features to a given technology (WCF, ADO.NET, Win Forms, etc) and a practice test is a good way to get a feel for what the most important features of that technology are. You may not know every detail about that feature after the practice test but at least down the road when you have a business need for that feature you know where to start looking. I would borrow a phrase from a favorite childhood cartoon GI-JOE.

    If GI-JOE were a .NET programmer he would have said: "Knowing where to look in the .NET Framework is half the battle.” MCP Certification tests are a great way to quickly learn where to look.

Comments

Unknown said…
Nice info...thx :)

For all Microsoft certification dumps latest updated in PDF format contact us at completeexamcollection@gmail.com. Refer our blog for more details http://completeexamcollection.blogspot.in/

Popular posts from this blog

How to Create and Run Tableau Bridge on Linux Containers

Tableau Bridge is now availble on Linux Containers. Yay! Now what does this mean and how do I build and run Linux Containers? We will discuss the advantages of running Bridge on Linux Containers the steps to build them, and finally, we will provide some automation script ideas for monitoring and scaling Linux Bridge agents. Tableau Bridge Today Until recently, Tableau Bridge was only available as a Windows application running on a Windows VM. It supported only one bridge agent per Virtual or Physical Machine. Advantages of Bridge in Containers Better Hardware Utilization: Linux containers are more efficient than Windows VMs, requiring only about 1/50th of the disk space. Ability to Spin Up Multiple Bridge Agents: With Linux Containers, it becomes easier to spin up multiple bridge agents on a single machine, improving scalability and resource utilization. Infrastructure Automation: Linux Containers enable easier automation of provisioning bridge agents and upgrading Tableau Bridge, the...

RAM Disks do not speed up Visual Studio

  The limiting factor for Visual Studio is disk IO. I got a tip to speed up Visual Studio from Channel 9 by creating a RAM disk which sounded like a great idea. However, when I ran a thorough set of tests, I found that the performance difference between the Ram disk and the hard disk were not appreciably different. This was a big surprise since RAM is 240,000 times faster than disk (see my previous blog post). But the reason is because Visual Studio and Vista do a lot of caching. So compile times for the same project in RAM disk and on hard disk were pretty similar. I also tested the time it took to search the entire solution for a word, and times to open a solution. There was no discernable difference!   If you still want to try it out and create your own RAM disk, you can download a simple RAMDISK.EXE utility to create a RAM disk in just a few minutes. What is a RAM Disk ?   Ramdisk is a virtual drive created in RAM.   Performance Analysis Creating f...

SpreadsheetGear vs. SyncFusion vs. ComponentOne

I conducted a three month analysis comparing three top spreadsheet controls for .NET application developers: SpreadsheetGear , SyncFusion Spreadsheet , and ComponentOne Spread.NET . The definite winner was SpreadsheetGear, with ComponentOne Spread.net in second. SpreadsheetGear provides the most Excel-like experience, is the most performant, and provides the most responsive and capable product support. I build a reporting engine for my company and SpreadsheetGear made it awesome. Our customers have been very pleased. I wanted to share my extensive analysis with any other developers out there trying to find the right spreadsheet control for their .NET application.   Comparison Spreadsheet gear grid goes to 1 million! Wow. (SyncFusion goes to 500 by default, ComponentOne goes to 60k) SpreadsheetGear is an older control which has been around for a while. It is built by the same guys who built Formula1, so they have been doing spreadsheets for many years. Sp...