Skip to main content

Bitcoin does have intrinsic value

In response to an article which states that bitcoin has no intrinsic value, here are my thoughts.

Bitcoin does have characteristics which make it potentially more userful than than existing mediums of exchange. It is has near-zero transaction costs. Compare this with Visa/MasterCard. And try sending gold in the mail.

Bitcoin also has real intrinsic value because it is more secure than Visa/MasterCard in that the recipient of payment cannot extract from your account more than you intended them to. When you give someone your credit card number, they can then use that number to take any amount of money they want from you. When you send money via bitcoin, they can’t because you aren’t sending your private key. With Visa/MasterCard we are giving our private key to a merchant. Bitcoin is not a crazy idea, Visa/MasterCard is!

By reducing cost of money exchange world-wide, Bitcoin has huge potential economic benefits for the world economy.

Who is a potential customer for Bitcoin? Everyone in the world. Not one country, not one language, or one demographic. Everyone. Talk about market potential. If you thought the China market was big …

The biggest threat to Bitcoin, in my opinion, is that early adopters include shady folks and bitcoin could potentially get a bad reputation because of it. But look back at the Internet, the most profitable business in the early days included a larger proportion of shady uses (pornography). The Internet got a bad reputation because of it. However, as the masses of people adopted the Internet, more honest/legitimate people became the majority and look how many good/legitimate things happen on the Internet today. Gavin Andresen has an interesting post suggesting folks contact their local representatives pointing out that bitcoin will create jobs in order to boost the chances of bitcoin being legitamized in the eyes of government.

I must state that bitcoin is not something I recommend as an investment. It is currently in early infancy and has a few years yet before the bitcoin ecosystem will be robust enough to support the hundreds of millions of dollars currently in circulation. A bitcoin today, honestly is not worth the $15-30 dollars they have been trading for for the past 30 days. The current price is the product of hype and speculation.  However, as a software engineer, and an Economics major, the technical and economical foundations of bitcoin are potentially quite sound. I have read all the technical posts on the bitcoin wiki and Satoshi's paper, and I am impressed. On the other hand, I am not impressed with the bitcoin client, mtgox or mybitcoin. It is almost emarrassing how poorly written these sites are, and they all need to be dramatically improved before millions of dollars of value is entrusted to them. This is why I don't recommend bitcoin as an investment. These sites are in early beta and are not ready for prime time use. However, give these sites a year or so and I am hopeful they will dramatically improve.

I think competition is good. Vista/mastercard and baking currently have little competition. Banks and national currencies are currently much more stable, safe and predictable than bitcoin. However Bitcoin has some very clever ideas on making transaction costs lower, reducing fraud and identity theft, and reducing costs of exchanging money internationally. People need to demand that banks find better ways than exchanging credit card numbers which is really quite silly. Bitcoin may give banks a few ideas, or else it will replace them. I am confident that banks and credit cards and their employees will rise to the occasion and come up with some clever solutions of their own. The biggest threat to bitcoin is not goverments declaring it illegal, but bank innovation. In either case if banks or bitcoins win the battle of innovation, quality of life is the winner.

Comments

I must say that since I published this post, I have become more cautious about Bitcoin. I lost some money investing in it because the Bitcoin infrastructure is immature, and it has unfortunately attracted a good bit of dishonesty. I'll keep my eye on Bitcoin as it has some impressive solutions for double spending, proof of ownership, value from scarcity, ex-changeability, decentralization, predictable grown of money supply, etc.

But for now I'm watching from the sidelines.

Popular posts from this blog

How to Create and Run Tableau Bridge on Linux Containers

Tableau Bridge is now availble on Linux Containers. Yay! Now what does this mean and how do I build and run Linux Containers? We will discuss the advantages of running Bridge on Linux Containers the steps to build them, and finally, we will provide some automation script ideas for monitoring and scaling Linux Bridge agents. Tableau Bridge Today Until recently, Tableau Bridge was only available as a Windows application running on a Windows VM. It supported only one bridge agent per Virtual or Physical Machine. Advantages of Bridge in Containers Better Hardware Utilization: Linux containers are more efficient than Windows VMs, requiring only about 1/50th of the disk space. Ability to Spin Up Multiple Bridge Agents: With Linux Containers, it becomes easier to spin up multiple bridge agents on a single machine, improving scalability and resource utilization. Infrastructure Automation: Linux Containers enable easier automation of provisioning bridge agents and upgrading Tableau Bridge, the...

RAM Disks do not speed up Visual Studio

  The limiting factor for Visual Studio is disk IO. I got a tip to speed up Visual Studio from Channel 9 by creating a RAM disk which sounded like a great idea. However, when I ran a thorough set of tests, I found that the performance difference between the Ram disk and the hard disk were not appreciably different. This was a big surprise since RAM is 240,000 times faster than disk (see my previous blog post). But the reason is because Visual Studio and Vista do a lot of caching. So compile times for the same project in RAM disk and on hard disk were pretty similar. I also tested the time it took to search the entire solution for a word, and times to open a solution. There was no discernable difference!   If you still want to try it out and create your own RAM disk, you can download a simple RAMDISK.EXE utility to create a RAM disk in just a few minutes. What is a RAM Disk ?   Ramdisk is a virtual drive created in RAM.   Performance Analysis Creating f...

SpreadsheetGear vs. SyncFusion vs. ComponentOne

I conducted a three month analysis comparing three top spreadsheet controls for .NET application developers: SpreadsheetGear , SyncFusion Spreadsheet , and ComponentOne Spread.NET . The definite winner was SpreadsheetGear, with ComponentOne Spread.net in second. SpreadsheetGear provides the most Excel-like experience, is the most performant, and provides the most responsive and capable product support. I build a reporting engine for my company and SpreadsheetGear made it awesome. Our customers have been very pleased. I wanted to share my extensive analysis with any other developers out there trying to find the right spreadsheet control for their .NET application.   Comparison Spreadsheet gear grid goes to 1 million! Wow. (SyncFusion goes to 500 by default, ComponentOne goes to 60k) SpreadsheetGear is an older control which has been around for a while. It is built by the same guys who built Formula1, so they have been doing spreadsheets for many years. Sp...